Recent Movies
‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات autism community. إظهار كافة الرسائل
‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات autism community. إظهار كافة الرسائل

Autism Community?‎ ASAN Is Anti Autism Cure and Nothing More

ASAN does NOT represent the autism "community".

At best it represents some persons with High Functioning Autism and Aspergers who view autism disorders not as medical disorders but as a social club for persons at the high functioning end of the spectrum and those people without autism spectrum disorders who, for whatever reason, like to self identify as autistic. It is not even clear if ASAN is referring to autism spectrum diagnoses when it refers to "autism" since it expressly rejects the "medical" model of autism in its by-laws:

" 1 MISSION STATEMENT

The Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN) seeks to improve the representation of the autistic community in public policy discussions and to advance the autistic culture movement. Based on neurodiversity and the social model of disability, ASAN seeks to promote social acceptance of neurological differences and to improve disability services and accommodations."

What the above statement indicates is that ASAN, presumably led by some persons with actual DSM diagnoses of Aspergers Disorder, and some higher functioning persons with PDD-NOS and Autistic Disorder, have started an organization which rejects the medical basis on which they have organized - their medical Autism Spectrum Diagnoses. Beyond that ASAN promotes the view that persons with autism are different but do not actually have a disorder. Accordingly no cure should be sought for persons with autism.

When Ari Ne'eman and company say WE don't want to be cured of our autism they are not talking about themselves as individuals or even about members of their organization. They object to parents seeking to treat and cure their own children and professionals who seek to help their efforts. While I acknowledge that it is Mr. Ne'eman's right to speak on behalf of himself in opposing treatment and cure for his àutism spectrum social condition, he and ASAN go further and oppose the right of parents to seek treatment for their own autistic children including those who are, unlike Mr. Ne'eman and the ASAN Board of Directors, severely autistic. They say so very expressly in the comment Autism Speaks in Columbus: Let Them Eat Cure by Meg Evans.

In the article above mentioned the author refers to several people who joined her at the ASAN protest of the Central Ohio/Ohio State University Autism Speaks walk which saw approximately 6,000 autistic persons, family members and friends turn walk to raise funds for autism research. The reality is that ASAN is a high profile extremist group which, thanks to the media talents of its very high functioning leadership, makes a big splash with autism ignorant organizations like the New Yorker and Canada`s CBC. It is too bad that these autism dilettante media organizations do not have their reporters get out of their comfortable chairs and go to events such as walks for autism research to see who actually speaks for autism ... it is the parents, family and friends of autistic children and severely autistic adults who are actually fighting to improve the lives of the truly autistic.




Bookmark and Share

Autism Society Canada Letter to Health Minister Clement re CIHR Autism Symposium
















October 3rd, 2007

Honorable Tony Clement

House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A6


cc: Rémi Quirion, PhD
Scientific Director
CIHR Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction

cc: Barbara Beckett, PhD
Assistant Director
CIHR Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction


Dear Honorable Tony Clement,

Autism Society Canada (ASC) recently received an invitation to send a representative to the
previously cancelled (June 2007) Canadian Institutes of Health Research Autism Symposium now taking place on November 8th-9th, 2007 in Toronto. The CIHR is hosting this event in collaboration with Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada.


The symposium was described in our invitation as “part of a package of federal initiatives that the Honourable Tony Clement, the federal Minister of Health, announced in November 2006 to
improve knowledge and research on autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and to help address the
challenges facing individuals with ASD and their families.”

The symposium goals stated in the original March 2007 letter were as follows:

Provide latest research results for families, health care professionals and other service providers, policy makers & administrators. Provide researchers with perspectives of families and service providers regarding what types of interventions are perceived as most effective and need to be further investigated .

Provide families, service providers, researchers, and policy makers & administrators with information about what is being done in Canada and abroad, to identify best practices in intervention and service delivery.


The revised goals outlined in this new invitation are as follows:

To inform service providers, policy makers, and those with autism and their families about the scientific evidence base on autism. To assist the research community in planning further research.

We are deeply concerned by what seems like a redirection of this meeting. ASC hosted the first
Canadian Autism Research Workshop in Toronto in 2002, with lead sponsors: the Canadian
Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the National Alliance for Autism Research (NAAR) in the U.S.

While we appreciate and welcome this opportunity to participate in moving the autism
research agenda forward, we do have concerns about what appears to be dwindling community
input into this process as well as how exactly this event will “address the challenges facing
individuals with ASD and their families.”

We would like to know if this research symposium is meant to replace the broader stakeholder
symposium you announced last November – an ASD stakeholder symposium in 2007 to further
the development of ASD knowledge and dissemination among health care professionals,
researchers, community groups, teachers, individuals and family members? There is great
community concern that your department has chosen to respond only to the research components of both your 2006 promises and the Senate recommendations of May 2007.

In its final report entitled, PAY NOW OR PAY LATER: Autism Families in Crisis, the Senate
Committee made many important recommendations to the federal government, prioritizing the
following:

an autism strategy to address the complex needs of our community – one that would be inclusive of all stakeholders, including those with ASD;

to convene a federal/provincial/territorial ministerial conference to look at innovative funding arrangements for the purpose of financing autism therapy in order to establish an “appropriate level of funding by the federal government”; and,

creation of an Autism Research Network with substantial new funding through CIHR.

While the research component is important, there are currently glaring gaps in the availability of fully funded treatment for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders, as well as damaging service gaps for adults and youth with ASD. Autism Society Canada strongly believes that federal leadership is needed to develop and commit to a comprehensive National Autism Strategy. The lifespan needs facing our community are complex. The treatment, training, service and accommodation needs across the ASD spectrum are multi-faceted. Families and people with ASD are tired of waiting.

As you are aware, ASC represents a federation of Canada-wide provincial and territorial autism
societies whose collective memberships include a very large community of individuals with ASD
and their families in Canada. We have carefully outlined our concerns regarding the process by
which this research symposium has come about in our letter to you of August 6th, 2007 letter to
Hon. Tony Clement . Some of the concerns centered on the last-minute notice for representatives with ASD who need time to make plans and prepare. We have yet to receive a reply to this letter.

We are being asked by many members of our community, including researchers, whether CIHR has ensured fair regional representation at this closed meeting. Our members provide direct services to the ASD community. They are very well-positioned to provide comprehensive regional input by identifying the practical needs and realities for children and adults with ASD in their respective areas. They feel this input should inform the planning of future research initiatives. They have requested that CIHR, if it has not already done so, ensure that each member society of ASC is invited to put forward a representative of their choosing to this research symposium.

Quite a number of people have made enquiries of CIHR about representation and have been told by CIHR that this is a complex scientific meeting – the implication being that community
representatives will find the content somehow confounding. CIHR staff should be aware that when they are speaking with ASD parents, people with ASD and community representatives, they are in fact, speaking with “experts in the field”. In the invitation letter, CIHR has referred to the research symposium as being, above all…… an opportunity for knowledge exchange, networking, and community-building. Can a closed research meeting with a private invitation list and no available genda, help to build community?

Finally we would like to remind the Minister that expecting people with ASD and their families,
who are already shouldering serious financial burdens, to front the costs for attending this meeting in advance was unrealistic and actually sets up a barrier to participation. We are sure this is not what you or CIHR intended.


ASC looks forward to working with you and CIHR to further the ASD research agenda. We also
look forward to addressing the other key National ASD Strategy issues brought forward in your
November, 2006 announcement and especially in the 2007 Senate Report. October is Autism
Awareness Month, let’s work together to ensure that all Canadians with ASD will one day be able to reach their full potential.

Sincerely,

Christine Dade, President,


On behalf of ASC’s Board of Directors:

Michael Lewis, First Vice-President, (representing British Columbia)

Vic Douse, Director, Second Vice-President, (representing Prince Edward Island)

Nancy Adams, CA, Treasurer, (Chair, Finance Committee)

David Jardine (representing Alberta)

Sandra McKay, Director, (representing Manitoba)

Brian Rimpilainen, Director, (representing New Brunswick)

Doreen Stryde, Director, (representing Newfoundland)

Lynn Elkin, Director, (representing Northwest Territories)

Vicki Harvey, Director (representing Nova Scotia)

Ginny Pearce, Director, (representing Ontario)

Lynn Verklan, Director, (representing Saskatchewan)

Lisa Rawlings, Director, (representing Yukon Territory)

Dr. Jeanette Holden, Director, (Queen’s University: ASD-Canadian-American Research Consortium)

Kristian Hooker, Director, (Chair, Advisory Committee of Adults with ASD)

Elizabeth Oliver, Director (Director-at-Large)

Stephen Harper's Hand Picked Autism "Stakeholder Representatives"

The Stephen Harper government has a pathetically feeble national autism strategy. Essentially it consists of a mediocre Autism Web Page and a Postponed Autism "Stakeholders' Symposium". The "Stakeholders' Symposium" was postponed at the last minute; purportedly because the Government of Canada couldn't find a big room in which to hold the event. In reality it was cancelled because too many outspoken autism advocates, including me, were being nominated by autism organizations to attend the symposium.

Now the government, and CIHR Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction are sending out invitations to a rescheduled Autism Symposium to be held November 8th-9th, 2007, at the Four Points Sheraton Hotel, Toronto Airport . Prior to sending out the invitations the government, and CIHR, solicited names from various professionals and other individuals from the various regions of Canada to attend. They did not ask the provincial autism societies for names, even though as stated by CIHR Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction Scientific Director Rémi Quirion, PhD and Assistant Director Barbara Beckett, PhD:

"Above all, the symposium is being organized as an opportunity for
knowledge exchange, networking, and community-building."

It is a funny exercise in community building when the government officials and bureaucrats pick who will attend as representatives of community organizations. The decision as to who will represent a community or organization is one that should be made by that community or organization not by other parties. Undoubtedly the delegates chosen will be people who will not rock the Harper Conservative government boat. The PR releases coming from the symposium will also undoubtedly reflect the Harper position, or non-position, on autism generally.

The "Autism Symposium" may turn out to be many things but it will not be an exercise in "community building". It will be just one more page from Stephen Harper's Book of Dirty Tricks - the Autism Edition.

Labels

أحدث المواضيع

 
Support : Creating Website | Johny Template | Mas Template
Copyright © 2013. Entries General - All Rights Reserved
Template Created by Creating Website Published by Mas Template
Proudly powered by Blogger