Recent Movies
‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات Autism Knowledge Revolution. إظهار كافة الرسائل
‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات Autism Knowledge Revolution. إظهار كافة الرسائل

Study Suggests Post-Natal, Environmental Causes of Autism

"Our results suggest that FKPB12 regulates neuron signaling that curbs the manifestation of traits observed in several neurological disorders including autism, obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizophrenia.These disorders are widely believed to be "determined in utero by genetic hormonal and environmental factors. Because our study indicates that postnatal release of mTOR activity can result in certain perseverative behaviors, it challenges the idea that some aspects of these conditions are developmentally predetermined."

- AFP, NYU neuroscientist Dr. Eric Klann

Autism clearly has a strong genetic component. Some believe it is entirely genetic with no environmental causes or factors. Those who subscribe to the "entirely genetic" belief find it easy to believe that the astonishing rise in the numbers of autism disorder diagnoses is due entirely to diagnostic definition changes, enhanced public awareness and other social factors. If they are wrong in their beliefs, and if scientific researchers and health authorities refuse to investigate potential environmental causes or triggers of autism then possible treatments, cures or enhancements of the lives of autistic people will be sacrificed on the alter of such unwarranted certainty.

From the erroneous and harmful "Refrigerator Mother" beliefs of Bettelheim to the belief that autism arises solely from genetic factors our popular understanding of, and ability to treat and cure, autism disorders have been restricted by simplistic, single factor explanations of the complex group of pervasive developmental, or autism spectrum, disorders. Recently though there has begun an autism research paradigm shift based on the view that:

"autism is not a rare disorder with a constant rate but frequent condition with a rising incidence. It is a combination of environmental influence and genetic vulnerabilities. It is both preventable and treatable, not by any one method but by a combination of behavioral and biomedical approaches. Autistic kids are not defective, they are sick but otherwise normal kids, and thus, recoverable."

A significant example of the autism research paradigm shift can be seen in the recent study authored by researchers at New York University's Center for Neural Science and the Baylor College of Medicine and published in Neuron,Volume 60, Issue 5, 832-845, 10 December 2008. The researchers studied the effects on mice of removal of the FK506-binding protein 12 (FKBP12) which regulates an enzyme (mTOR) involved in learning and memorization. mTOR affects the the ability to change behavior and regulates connections between neurons thereby playing a key role in learning and memorization.

As stated on AFP News, removal of FKBP12 from the brains of mice late in development reduced the mice's capacity to analyze, respond and adapt to new situations. In one example the FKBP12 removed mice, once they learned a path through a maze, had difficulty learning how to travel through a different version of the maze. The AFP article describes this phenomenon as "enhanced perseveration, or pathological repetition, ... often observed in individuals suffering from autism or other neurological disorders".

The Autism Research Paradigm Shift is a central component of the Autism Knowledge Revolution now taking place. Hopefully, that revolution in learning and understanding autism disorders will not be derailed or slowed by the world's current economic crisis ... or by ideologies, agendas and simplistic views of autism disorders.




Bookmark and Share

The CDC and the Autism Research Paradigm Shift

David Kirby has published, at the Age of Autism, a letter from an official in the Office of CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding in which it is stated that:

While it is important to understand if autism is affecting any group of children disproportionately, it is also important to keep in mind that there are likely multiple causes of the autism spectrum of disorders. Most scientists agree that today's research will show that a person's genetic profile may make them more or less susceptible to ASDs as a result of any number of factors such as infections, the physical environment, chemical exposures, or psychosocial components.

It is not clear from Mr. Kirby's article who the official in the office of Dr. Gerberding was that sent the email or whether that official's view represents the official view of the CDC. But it seems consistent with the autism research paradigm shift proposed by the University of Minnesota:

Autism research is poised for another paradigm shift, from an irreversible condition to a treatable disease. In the revolutionary paradigm, autism is not a rare disorder with a constant rate but frequent condition with a rising incidence. It is a combination of environmental influence and genetic vulnerabilities. It is both preventable and treatable, not by any one method but by a combination of behavioral and biomedical approaches. Autistic kids are not defective, they are sick but otherwise normal kids, and thus, recoverable.

Creating a premier center for effective treatment of autism is not as simple as adding a new wing on a hospital, purchasing the latest medical technology or creating another diagnostic center.

What is needed is a revolutionary clinical effort premised on the paradigm that autism may well be a treatable and preventable disease.

The Autism Knowledge Revolution has been marked by dramatic advances in our understanding of the structural and genetic bases of autism. The autism research paradigm shift, a shift toward investigation of the interaction of genetic susceptibility and environmental triggers may well speed the pace of that knowledge revolution.

Reactionary bloggers at the Autism Hub and Neurodiversity ideological movements will not be happy with the autism research paradigm shift but the maturing of scientific inquiry into autism, the movement past official defensiveness, may someday result in more effective treatment and cures. And those are autism realities that will be happily embraced by most parents of autistic children.




Bookmark and Share

"MARBLES" - Rare Study Examines Environmental Factors In Autism Disorders

MARBLES, Markers of Autism Risk in Babies - Learning Early Signs, is a rarity. The study being conducted by UC Davis researcher Irva Hertz-Picciotto is looking at possible environmental triggers for autism.

The Autism Knowledge Revolution advances almost daily with announcements of genetic studies and breakthroughs in understanding genetic causes or bases for autism spectrum disorders.
But there seem to be fewer studies focusing on possible environmental factors.

The News10/KXTV report quotes Ms. Hertz-Picciotto:

"Autism is very clearly not a single cause type of condition. It's got to be multiple factors," said Hertz-Picciotto, who hopes her study will reveal environmental factors that combined with genetics can trigger autism.

"We expect to find a number of different exposures that affect neurodevelopment and may be related to autism mildly, small increments of risk, for each exposure, but there may be multiple exposures," said Hertz-Picciotto.

To date the study involves 100 women and 59 babies who are being followed for a three year period. Blood samples will be withdrawn at regular periods.




Bookmark and Share

Autism and Nicotine Addiction - The Neurexin Connection

Science Daily reports on findings presented by Rene Anand, associate professor of pharmacology in Ohio State University’s College of Medicine and principal investigator of research presented today at the at the Society for Neuroscience meeting in Washington, D.C. The findings identified a relationship between two proteins in the brain that have links to both nicotine addiction and autism suggesting a possible drug therapy to alleviate some symptoms of autism.

The neurexin-1 gene produces a protein which lures another protein "a specific type of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, to the synapses, where the receptor then has a role in helping neurons communicate signals among themselves and to the rest of the body." Persons with autism have previously been found to have a shortage of nicotinic receptors in their brains while people who are addicted to nicotine have too many.

There is some speculation that drugs known as cholinergic agents, used to counter nicotine addiction, could be adjusted for use in autistic children in an effort to increase the level of neurexin-1 beta protein in their brains. It is hoped that more neurexin would alleviate some of the symptoms of autism by encouraging the presence of more nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and number of other proteins important for the proper formation and maturation of synapses.

These cholinergic agents already exist so presumably they will be adjusted for autism as described and their effectiveness tested in the near future.

The Autism Knowledge Revolution continues.




Bookmark and Share

FMR4 - New Gene Link to Fragile X and Autism

The Autism Knowledge Revolution is continuing at such an explosive pace that it barely makes the news when an important new research development provides new insights into the biological structures and process of autism disorder. More of the genes associated with autism and related conditions, Fragile X, in the report that follows, are becoming known. At times it seems on a daily basis.

PLoS ONE has published a report - A Novel RNA Transcript with Antiapoptotic Function Is Silenced in Fragile X Syndrome of a study by researchers Ahmad M. Khalil, Mohammad Ali Faghihi, Farzaneh Modarresi, Shaun P. Brothers, Claes Wahlestedt of the Molecular and Integrative Neurosciences Department (MIND), The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida which identifies a new gene FMR4 involved with Fragile X syndrome and potentially many cases of autism.

In New Gene Linked To Fragile X Syndrome -- Suggests Potential Targets For Autism And Other Neurological Disorders Science Daily translates from science into layperson the article published in PLoS ONE :


ScienceDaily (Jan. 30, 2008) — Scientists at The Scripps Research Institute have discovered a new gene involved in fragile X syndrome, a condition that often shares many symptoms of autism. The discovery may lead to new tests or treatments for several neurological disorders.

...

Fragile X syndrome affects thousands of patients worldwide with severe learning disabilities, often accompanied by anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive behavior, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. There are currently no therapeutic treatments available for fragile X syndrome. Approximately one-third of all children diagnosed with fragile X syndrome also have some degree of autism, according to The National Fragile X Foundation, including such behaviors as social anxiety, poor eye contact, and hand biting.

More than 16 years ago, scientists linked fragile X syndrome to inactivation of FMR1 gene expression, leading to the lack of a protein known as the fragile X mental retardation protein, now considered to be critical for neuronal function. Until the current study, no other functional gene other than FMR1 had been shown to be inactivated in the disorder.

However, Wahlestedt knew the FMR1 gene locus-a specific point on a chromosome-was not well mapped. Wahlestedt and his colleagues hypothesized that unknown regulatory genes might be transcribed from the region.

The new study shows at least one other functional gene-FMR4-from this genetic region is linked to fragile X syndrome, although the gene's exact role in the intact brain remains uncharacterized.......

For anyone wondering, as I was, what the term anti-apoptic means, it relates to apoptosis for which I found some definitions on-line:

MedicineNet.com:

Apoptosis:

A form of cell death in which a programmed sequence of events leads to the elimination of cells without releasing harmful substances into the surrounding area. Apoptosis plays a crucial role in developing and maintaining health by eliminating old cells, unnecessary cells, and unhealthy cells. The human body replaces perhaps a million cells a second. Too little or too much apoptosis plays a role in a great many diseases. When programmed cell death does not work right, cells that should be eliminated may hang around and become immortal. For example, in cancer and leukemia. When apoptosis works overly well, it kills too many cells and inflicts grave tissue damage. This is the case in strokes and neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer, Huntington and Parkinson diseases. Apoptosis is also called programmed cell death or cell suicide. Strictly speaking, the term apoptosis refers only to the structural changes cells go through, and programmed cell death refers to the complete underlying process, but the terms are often used interchangeably.

Merriam-Webster OnLine

apoptosis

Main Entry:
ap·o·pto·sis Listen to the pronunciation of apoptosis
Pronunciation:
\ˌa-pəp-ˈtō-səs, -pə-ˈtō-\
Function:
noun
Inflected Form(s):
plural ap·o·pto·ses Listen to the pronunciation of apoptoses \-ˌsēz\
Etymology:
New Latin, from Greek apoptōsis a falling off, from apopiptein to fall off, from apo- + piptein to fall — more at feather
Date:
1972
: a genetically directed process of cell self-destruction that is marked by the fragmentation of nuclear DNA, is activated either by the presence of a stimulus or removal of a suppressing agent or stimulus, and is a normal physiological process eliminating DNA-damaged, superfluous, or unwanted cells —called also programmed cell death
ap·o·pto·tic Listen to the pronunciation of apoptotic \-ˈtä-tik\ adjective

Autism, Genetics and Environment - Study Finds Autism Immune System Link


A study reported in the January 2008 issue of Genomics, Gene expression changes in children with autism, has found that a group of genes with known links to natural-killer cells, that attack viruses, bacteria and malignancies, are expressed at high levels in the blood of children with autism when compared to children without the disorder. The study also found gene expression distinctions in children with early onset and regressive autism. The study is summarized in a digestible format on the UC Newsroom article Researchers identify gene expression profile distinctions in children with autism. Comments by the senior researcher Frank Sharp M.D. clinical neurologist, neuroscientist, and professor, department of neurology, school of medicine, indicate that the findings suggest a possible environmental role in the development of autism disorders:

"What we found were 11 specific genes with expression levels that were significantly higher in the blood of children with autism when compared to the blood of typically developing children," said Frank Sharp, senior author of the study and professor of neurology with the M.I.N.D. Institute.

"Those 11 genes are all known to be expressed by natural-killer cells, which are cells in the immune system necessary for mounting a defense against infected cells. We were surprised by our results because we were not looking for these particular genes. And while a number of studies have shown immune system dysregulation to be an important factor in autism, ours is one of the first to implicate these particular cells."

...

"What we are seeing can reflect something in the environment that is triggering the activation of these genes or something genetic that the children have from the time they were conceived," Sharp explained. "Such an immune response could be caused by exposure to a virus, another infectious agent or even a toxin.

Another possibility is that these changes represent a genetic susceptibility factor that predisposes children to autism when they are exposed to some environmental factor."
He added that the current study also does not identify whether or not the natural-killer cells are functioning abnormally, which further work by M.I.N.D. Institute immunologists will reveal. "If the natural-killer cells are dysfunctional, this might mean that they cannot rid a pregnant mother, fetus or newborn of an infection, which could contribute to autism."

The study is also featured in an article by Carrie Peyton Dahlberg at sacbee.com which features several interesting comments by Dr. Jeffrey Gregg, director of molecular diagnostics for the UC Davis Medical Center who was also involved in the study. It is pointed out that both similarities and differences were found between the early onset and regression autism cases:

Children with that "regressive" autism had nearly 500 genes that were activated differently than children with "early onset" autism, Gregg and his colleagues found after examining blood samples from 61 children.

"That would suggest that those two groups are very different … and may have totally different underlying pathology," Gregg said.

Both groups, though, as well as other children with a range of symptoms called autism spectrum disorder, shared the 11 strongly expressed genes that control natural killer immune cells.

Dr. David Amaral, the UC Davis MIND Institute's research director suggested that much remains to be learned about how the genetic and environmental factors giving rise to autism interact:

It is still unclear how early those differences emerge, but other MIND Institute researchers are looking at immune differences in mothers' bloodstreams that might be predictive for having a child with autism, said Dr. David Amaral, the institute's research director.

"Things are moving really, really fast now," Amaral said, with scientists around the country working to understand the relationship of genetic and environmental factors that may underlie autism.

It seems clear from this study that environmental factors can not be ruled out in trying to understand the causes -- and potential treatments for autism. Some of the rhetoric which dismisses all genetic or all environmental factors appears to be ill founded. The Autism Knowledge Revolution is being carried out by researchers and scientists in relevant medical fields and the knowledge they are gaining appears to point to both genetics and environment as being involved in the development of autism.

Facing Autism in New Brunswick Nominated For A 2007 Canadian Blog Award


Facing Autism in New Brunswick has been nominated for recognition in the Best Personal Blog category of the Canadian Blog Awards 2007 . It really is an honour and I thank Scott Tribe for the nomination. There are a number of excellent blogs nominated in the Personal Blog category and I feel good about just being included in that list.

I am happy to see that some people appreciate the realistic approach that I have taken in describing Autism Disorders and my son's life as a person with Autism Disorder and profound developmental delays. There are many blog sites on the internet which paint a rosy picture, a joyful picture of autism. Some of these sites are hosted by people who condemn any attempt to describe autism realistically.

I have always believed that I would be doing a great disservice to Conor by bowing to pressure to paint autism as something other than what it is for him and so many other autistic persons - a debilitating neurological disorder which severely limits their life prospects. I include happy stories, and happy pictures, of life with Conor on this site. He is my buddy. And he makes me very happy. But daily life with Conor's autism is a real challenge and sometimes he hurts himself and others. His long term prospects - after his mom and dad have departed as we all must do - are not pretty. I feel obligated to tell the world the complete truth, good and bad, about Autism Disorder.

For now there is little in the way of evidence based treatments or interventions available to help autistic children. Applied Behavior Analysis, ABA, is the only intervention which has consistently, based on decades of research, been found to be effective in making gains in all domains for autistic children but even ABA is not a cure.

There is, however, an incredible explosion of research now taking place in various areas of autism. The neurological structures and processes of autism, causes and possible treatments are all being explored. We truly are living in the era of the Autism Knowledge Revolution. Hope for treatments to improve the lives for autistic persons is more realistic today than ever before.

Long live the revolution. Long live the Autism Knowledge Revolution.

CNTNAP2 Gene And The Unravelling Of Autism Spectrum Disorders


If anyone doubted that we are living in the era of the Autism Knowledge Revolution they should doubt no longer. The January 10 2008 edition of the American Journal of Human Genetics includes reports of three studies which separately validate the March 2006 study led by Dr. Dietrich A. Stephan, that identified a gene called CNTNAP2 which, when mutated, suggested a predisposition to autism. In Unravelling Autism Dr. Stephan comments on the three studies and states:

In this issue of AJHG, Alarcón et al.,1 Arking et al.,2 and Bakkaloglu et al.3 identify a series of functional variants in the CNTNAP2 gene that unequivocally implicate this gene as causing Type 1 autism in the general population. ...... The modern technologies and strategies derived from the Human Genome Project, coupled with the elegant sample banking, phenotyping, and data dissemination resources of groups like AGRE, are resulting, finally, in the unraveling of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Dr. Stephan offers characteristics of Type 1 autism which many parents will recognize in their autistic children:

The three studies herein1, 2, 3 have moderate sample overlap and use different strategies to narrow the phenotype of the ASD cohorts to relative homogeneity before performing genotyping/resequencing across the CNTNAP2 gene locus. Nevertheless, the three studies together identify a set of common and rare variants that provide unequivocal evidence that the CNTNAP2 gene, when disrupted, leads to a subtype of ASD. This genetic subtype can be clinically characterized by ADOS/ADI-R-defined autism with language deficits and potential gender bias and parent-of-origin effects. Type 1 autism may also be associated with seizures.

The gender bias referred to by Dr. Stephan is the male gender bias associated with autism which sees from 3 to 1 to 4 to 1 male to female ratios amongst persons with autism. On the practical side Dr. Stephan indicates that the CNTNAP2 information might be of assistance in early detection and intervention in the 12 to 24 month period.

Autism, Chromosome 16p11.2 and De Novo Gene Mutations


As the father of a son with Autism Disorder I have been following closely the incredible explosion of research into the nature, causes and possible treatments for autism, what I describe as the Autism Knowledge Revolution. As someone who is not a scientist or researcher I try to read the original journal articles publishing these findings but usually have to resort to other sources to translate the language and concepts downward to my own level of understanding which is basically plain English.

It is exciting to see new reports like the Association between Microdeletion and Microduplication at 16p11.2 and Autism published in the New England Journal of Medicine which identifies a Chromosome involved in 1% of autism cases. I try to read and understand the original articles but I also like to consult layman's interpretations offered by credible sources for help and certainty that I truly understand the nature of the research and the possible implications of any findings. I also check other autism bloggers but do so with the knowledge that autism bloggers have a tendency to try and cram any new studies into their own ideological take on the major autism fault lines such as the genetics versus environment causal debates.


My own view for many years based on little more than the "twins" studies and my own son's pre and post natal history was that genetics was probably more significant than environment in causing autism. But I never ruled out environmental possibilities and it is not clear to me that a truly scientific, or at least a truly open minded approach ever rules any possible factor, or set of factors, out on an absolute basis. It is with that mindset that I have read the Chromosome 16p11.2 report and various news commentaries on the report and its findings.


Any finding of a genetic basis to autism gives many of us an automatic knee-jerk thought that autism is an inherited condition, a simple "like father like son", causal relationship. But as I read the article, with my layman's limitations, I was struck by the reference to "de novo mutations" and it was difficult for me to see a simple direct inheritance relationship in what the authors were saying, although admittedly I might have misunderstood:

The abstract published in the NEJM states:

Methods As a first component of a genomewide association study of families from the Autism Genetic Resource Exchange (AGRE), we used two novel algorithms to search for recurrent copy-number variations in genotype data from 751 multiplex families with autism. Specific recurrent de novo events were further evaluated in clinical-testing data from Children's Hospital Boston and in a large population study in Iceland.

Results Among the AGRE families, we observed five instances of a de novo deletion of 593 kb on chromosome 16p11.2. Using comparative genomic hybridization, we observed the identical deletion in 5 of 512 children referred to Children's Hospital Boston for developmental delay, mental retardation, or suspected autism spectrum disorder, as well as in 3 of 299 persons with autism in an Icelandic population; the deletion was also carried by 2 of 18,834 unscreened Icelandic control subjects. The reciprocal duplication of this region occurred in 7 affected persons in AGRE families and 4 of the 512 children from Children's Hospital Boston. The duplication also appeared to be a high-penetrance risk factor.

Conclusions We have identified a novel, recurrent microdeletion and a reciprocal microduplication that carry substantial susceptibility to autism and appear to account for approximately 1% of cases. We did not identify other regions with similar aggregations of large de novo mutations.

As a practicing lawyer I am familiar, in the legal context, with the expression "de novo". In some Canadian legal processes an appeal can be done by way of "trial de novo", essentially a new trial before a higher tribunal, rather than an appeal of specific issues from the original trial. I wasn't sure what "de novo" meant in describing genes.

In What is a gene mutation and how do mutations occur? the NIMH states:

Previous pageNext page Previous pageNext page

A gene mutation is a permanent change in the DNA sequence that makes up a gene. Mutations range in size from a single DNA building block (DNA base) to a large segment of a chromosome.

Gene mutations occur in two ways: they can be inherited from a parent or acquired during a person’s lifetime. Mutations that are passed from parent to child are called hereditary mutations or germline mutations (because they are present in the egg and sperm cells, which are also called germ cells). This type of mutation is present throughout a person’s life in virtually every cell in the body.

Mutations that occur only in an egg or sperm cell, or those that occur just after fertilization, are called new (de novo) mutations. De novo mutations may explain genetic disorders in which an affected child has a mutation in every cell, but has no family history of the disorder.

Acquired (or somatic) mutations occur in the DNA of individual cells at some time during a person’s life. These changes can be caused by environmental factors such as ultraviolet radiation from the sun, or can occur if a mistake is made as DNA copies itself during cell division. Acquired mutations in somatic cells (cells other than sperm and egg cells) cannot be passed on to the next generation.

Every step forward in understanding autism is in itself a positive development. And popular comment on the Chromosome 16p11.2 findings argue that the findings may help lead toward development of drugs which could be aimed at treating or curing some cases of autism. I hope so.

In the meantime though I also remain curious about the nature of the de novo gene muations involved and the extent to which they are caused by environmental factors.

Autism Predictions 2008

These are my autism predictions for 2008. Some are wildly speculative; some are ho hum continuations of existing trends. Like all attempts to "predict" the future they are inherently futile but I will make them anyway.

1. The Autism Knowledge Revolution will continue to expand and add to our real knowledge of autism disorders. 2007 saw a breathtaking explosion of research into the neurolgoical bases and structures of autism disorders. That trend will continue and the public will be informed less and less by prejudice and ideology and more and more by actual knowledge of what autism disorders are and how they can be treated. Research will also continue into possible environmental contributors to the rise of autism diagnoses.

2. In Canada the federal government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper will continue to ignore, thereby contributing to the worsening of , Canada's autism crisis just as it has helped sabotage international efforts to address the global warming crisis. (No this years return of a traditional Canadian winter does not offset the measurable reality that the polar ice caps are shrinking. In the North the warming is wrecking havoc on the Arctic environment and impairing the traditional Inuit way of life). Canada's National Autism Strategy will remain a joke as long as Stephen Harper remains as Prime Minister of Canada.

3. The stigma attached to intellectually impaired autistic persons will continue. Intellectually impaired autistic persons will remain invisible to the eyes of Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN and other major media organizations and stars who seek out autistic persons to portray for public consumption. And the Neurodiversity bloggers who like to portray historical geniuses such as Einstein as autistic will continue to deny the existence of the the many intellectually impaired autistic persons.

4. Ignorance about autism will continue. Autistic children in both Canada and the United States will still be sent home from public schools because "educators" are not educated about the realities of autism disorders. And some autistic youths will continue to be charged as criminals for behavior resulting from their autism disorders.

5. Autism reality will assert itself daily as lower functioning persons with autism move from the care of their families to residential and institutional settings where they will begin their lives in the care of strangers.

6. Some autistic persons such as Dr. Temple Grandin will continue to shine as role models for persons with Aspergers and High Functioning Autism.

7. Parents will continue to fight for their children with Autism Disorders. They will continue to educate, treat and care for their autistic children while hoping that the Autism Knowledge Revolution soon finds a cure for their children's Disorders. They will do so because they love their children - not their children's neurological disorders.


Autism and the Fever Effect

Is there a fever effect in children with autism? Can a fever temporarily offer some temporary improvement to autistic children? Some parents have thought they actually noticed such a beneficial effect from fever when their autistic children were young. I know in the past I thought I saw such an effect from fever with Conor but I thought it was just my imagination. Now, a study published in Pediatrics, suggests there may in fact be something to it; a fever may have a beneficial effect on autistic children.

In Behaviors Associated With Fever in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders Laura K. Curran, Craig J. Newschaffer, Li-Ching Lee, Stephen O. Crawford, Michael V. Johnston, and Andrew W. Zimmerman studies 30 autistic children aged 2-18 during and after an episode of fever and documented improvements in behavior. The researchers found less "aberrant" behavior in terms of irritability, hyperactivity, stereotypy and inappropriate speech. The study authors are careful to point out several limitations in the study including possible information bias arising from data collection by parent reports and possible selection bias resulting from participation by a small fraction of eligible families from recruitment sources and make suggestions for reducing these possible biases in future studies. They clearly indicate that further study is needed to prove conclusively that the improvements are fever-specific effects. The study offers several possible biological mechanism explanations for the effects involving immunologic and neurobiological pathways, intracellular signaling, and synaptic plasticityL:


(1) neurobiological effects of selected proinflammatory16 and/or antiinflammatory cytokines, which have been found to be increased in cerebrospinal fluid (in the absence of fever) and postmortem brain tissue of individuals with autism17 and may be generated during different phases of responses to fever, (2) modification of neuronal and synaptic function secondary to variations in body temperature that influence neural conduction velocities or synaptic transmission,18 (3) modification of dynamic neural networks as a result of changes in cellular signal transduction and gene transcription that regulate synapse formation and function,19 (4) increased production of other stress-related proteins, such as heat-shock proteins, during fever that might modify energy consumption and mitochondrial activity,20 and (5) stimulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis leading to modifications of neurotransmitter production and interaction.

The Fever Effect may or may not be confirmed in future studies but it is another interesting new development in the Autism Knowledge Revolution.

Autism Awareness Month - 1 in 150

In Canada, October is Autism Awareness Month.

Since October 2006 there have been many important developments in autism awareness. The Autism Knowledge Revolution has picked up steam with almost each new day bringing news of an important new scientific study on the causes of, or potential treatments for, autism. A Unified Autism Theory was advanced. There is a renewed focus on the study and development of bio-medical treatments. The CDC estimate of 1 in 166 persons having an autism disorder which had stood since 2004 was replaced in February 2007 by a prevalence rate of 1 in 150.

The 1 in 150 estimate by the CDC in the US is not necessarily the end of the story. In the UK the generally accepted estimate is 1 in 100. Debates continue to rage, as all debates on autism issues seem to do, over whether the newer prevalence rates actually reflect increases in autism cases, changes in diagnostic criteria and public awareness or some combination of these factors.

At the end of the day though the reality remains that autism specific services are needed in great number. Many autistic children pre-school or school age, require Applied Behavior Analysis intervention as a health treatment and as an educational interventions. And many autistic adults are not capable of living independent lives. SOME require residential care and treatment and some require full institutional care.

These are hard realities that many would rather avoid. We do so at peril, not to ourselves, but to the autistic persons we care about. During Autism Awareness month we should celebrate the joy that our autistic loved ones being to our lives but, if we truly care,we should also help them face the challenges ahead. We must ensure that autism specific services are available for them across the life span.

Yes, Autism Should Be Cured

Autism should be cured.

Most parents of severely autistic children will answer that question as I have just done. There are some high functioning autistic persons who argue that autism should not be cured. There are some parents of high functioning autistic persons and professionals who work with them who argue that autism should not be cured. Some simply ask whether we should seek to cure autism. The answer to any such question is yes, yes, yes, we should.

We should seek to cure autism so that severely autistic people can be cured and their lives enhanced. That is really all there is to it. This is not to suggest that the higher functioning autistic people who push their views on the internet should be forced to be cured. Absolutely not. But for severely autistic children, whose parents, legally, morally and practically speak for them, the answer is yes they should be given the chance to be cured. What other medical condition do we not seek to cure, or at least to give people the choice of being cured if they are capable of making the choice; or of having their care givers or guardians make the choice if they are not capable?

My son Conor is 11 1/2 and did not have access to 40 hours of ABA between the ages of 2 and 5. He has received ABA as much as possible though particularly since trained UNB-CEL Autism Training Intervention Program began graduating Autism Support Workers; some of whom now work in the school system. With ABA we are able to communicate at a basic level with Conor and he has learned some reading, writing and math skills. (He loves Dr. Seuss and Pinky Dinky Doo) We have also been able to moderate his self aggressive behaviour using ABA and knowledge of what environmental factors are likely to prompt frustration and self aggression.

Would we accept a cure for Conor if one were available and did not involve serious risk to his safety? Yes, if I could cure Conor's autism with the wave of my hand I would stop typing this commentary and do it now before finishing this sentence. I know that Conor is more than his autism; that his personality, his identity, are not dictated by his autism, that Conor would still be Conor. With one major difference. His opportunities to experience and enjoy life would be enhanced immeasurably.

The high functioning autistic persons who oppose curing autism have every right to decide not to be cured of their autism - for themselves. They have absolutely no right to do so for my son and other severely autistic children. They can argue until the sun ceases to shine but they will never convince me, nor most parents of severely autisic children, that we should not cure our children of their autism, that we should not enhance our childrens' lives as parents have strived to do since the beginning of human existence.

Yes, autism should be cured. And the Autism Knowledge Revolution which jumps almost daily onto our internet pages holds out great promise of doing exactly that.

Labels

أحدث المواضيع

 
Support : Creating Website | Johny Template | Mas Template
Copyright © 2013. Entries General - All Rights Reserved
Template Created by Creating Website Published by Mas Template
Proudly powered by Blogger